|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CytRx believes arimoclomol represents a potentially powerful breakthrough in the treatment of multiple Central Nervous System (CNS) disorders including Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease), Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and Parkinson's diseases. Originally developed to treat diabetic complications, arimoclomol was recently discovered to significantly inhibit progression of ALS in a mouse model of the disease. Arimoclomol is believed to function by amplifying "molecular chaperone" proteins, normally found in all cells of the body and thought to enhance the cell's natural ability to, in essence, mend damaged, misfolded proteins. Arimoclomol may thus provide cellular protection from misfolded, toxic proteins, repairing those that are believed to cause many diseases, including ALS. Arimoclomol has demonstrated the ability to protect motor nerves subjected to physical trauma and to accelerate the regeneration of previously damaged nerves in animals. These observations provide additional evidence that, in addition to ALS, it is possible that the drug may have a much broader application profile in the area of neurodegenerative diseases. Arimoclomol is an orally available small molecule compound that has been shown to be well tolerated in two previous Phase I clinical trials with healthy human subjects.
ALS Program
The development of therapeutics for the treatment of ALS is an area of significant interest for CytRx. ALS is a deadly and debilitating disease. According to the ALS Survival Guide, 50% of ALS patients die within 18 months of diagnosis and 80% of ALS patients die within five years of diagnosis. According to the ALS Association, in the United States alone, approximately 30,000 people are living with ALS and nearly 6,000 new cases are diagnosed each year.
In September 2006, CytRx announced that arimoclomol was shown to be safe and well tolerated at all three doses tested in its Phase IIa clinical trial in patients with ALS.
In the 10-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIa trial, ALS patients received placebo or arimoclomol in one of three dose levels (25 mg, 50 mg or 100 mg) three times daily for 12 weeks and then were studied for an additional four weeks without treatment. Eighty-four patients with ALS entered the clinical trial with only seven withdrawing prior to completion of dosing. No statistically significant treatment-related increases in adverse events were reported, and encouragingly, arimoclomol-treated patients reported fewer asthenia (weakness) adverse events than the patients receiving placebo. The minor treatment-related changes in laboratory results that reached statistical significance were well within the normal safety range and did not change with time or dose, and therefore were considered to be clinically unimportant. No treatment-related effects on vital signs, electrocardiogram or body weight were observed. Based on these results, CytRx plans to proceed with activities associated with initiating a Phase IIb clinical trial with arimoclomol for the treatment of ALS in the first half of 2007, subject to FDA approval.
One of the secondary endpoints of the trial included an analysis of pharmacokinetics (drug oral absorption, distribution, and removal). While full analysis of these data is not yet complete, tests indicate that arimoclomol effectively entered the cerebral spinal fluid, demonstrating that the drug passed the "blood:brain barrier," overcoming a potential impediment for the development of drugs like arimoclomol that are intended to treat neurodegenerative diseases. The average amount of drug detected in the cerebral spinal fluid was similar to the amounts present in blood and increased with increasing doses.
Additional secondary endpoints of the trial included a preliminary evaluation of the disease progression markers, the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and vital capacity (VC). The ALSFRS-R is used to determine a patient's capacity and independence in 13 functional activities and VC is an assessment of a patient's breathing capacity. As previously announced the Phase IIa clinical trial was designed with a scale and scope to show statistical significance with respect to safety and tolerability, with the planned monitoring of the rate of disease progression using ALSFRS-R and VC designed to show statistical significance only in the case of extreme responses to drug treatment. While disease progression was measured as a secondary endpoint, the primary purpose of the trial was to generate sufficient data regarding safety and tolerability to determine whether to proceed with a significantly larger Phase IIb clinical trial designed primarily to detect efficacy. As was expected by CytRx due to the limited size and duration of the trial, arimoclomol did not show a statistically significant change in disease progression as measured by these markers. However, the average decrease in ALSFRS-R score for those patients receiving the highest dose of arimoclomol was higher than the placebo group at all time points except week 12 after dose initiation (i.e. it was higher at weeks 4, 8 and 16 and substantially the same at week 12). This trend of higher ALSFRS-R scores in the high dose group relative to the placebo was not observed with VC as the indicator of disease progression.
In January 2006, CytRx initiated an open-label extension of this Phase IIa trial allowing patients who complete the trial to continue treatment with arimoclomol at the highest dose level three times daily for up to an additional six months. The open-label extension is designed to provide additional safety and tolerability data in combination with the previous Phase IIa trial. Approximately 99% of the patients who completed the Phase IIa trial elected to enroll in the open-label extension trial. It is anticipated that the open-label extension trial will be completed in January 2007.
Based on the results of the Phase IIa trial, CytRx plans to initiate a subsequent Phase IIb trial that will be powered to detect more subtle efficacy responses. Although this second trial is still in the planning stages and will be subject to FDA approval, it is currently expected to include approximately 400 ALS patients recruited from approximately 30 clinical sites, and will take approximately 18 months after initiation to complete. Given the severity of ALS and the lack of therapeutic treatment options, CytRx believes that positive efficacy and safety results from the Phase IIb clinical trial could be sufficient for arimoclomol product registration for this indication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
A New Approach to ALS Pharmacotherapy: Chaperone Amplification by Arimoclomol
More>>
|
 |
|
Phase IIa Arimoclomol Data Presented at the 17th International Symposium on ALS/MND Nov. 30 to Dec. 2, 2006 in Yokohama, Japan.
Phase IIa results presented at the 131st Annual Meeting of the American Neurological Association
October 8-11, 2006, Hyatt Regency, Chicago, IL
|
 |
|
In May 2005, the FDA granted arimoclomol Orphan Drug status for the treatment of ALS, giving CytRx numerous potential benefits, including opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages, FDA user-fee benefits, seven years of U.S. market exclusivity should the FDA grant marketing approval for the drug and an added mechanism for more frequent communication with the FDA.
In October 2006, arimoclomol was granted orphan medicinal product status for the treatment of ALS by the European Commission, providing for market exclusivity in the European Union for 10 years in the event that arimoclomol receives marketing approval, and provides for incentives such as reduced fees for protocol assistance and scientific advice.
|
 |
|
In September 2005, the FDA granted Arimoclomol Fast Track Designation for the treatment of ALS. Under the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, the Fast Track process is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of a new drug that demonstrates the potential to address a significant unmet medical need for the treatment of a serious or a life-threatening condition. The benefits of Fast Track include scheduled meetings seeking FDA input into development plans, the option of submitting a new drug application (NDA) in sections rather than submitting all components simultaneously, and the option of requesting evaluation of studies using surrogate endpoints.
|
|